Nokia 8 gets a poor DxOMark score

Smart Android And Trik-Commenting on Andorid indeed never endless, because smart devices this one is often updated every certain amount of time. So that the market can always be garapnya menerinya with pleasure. And it is not denied if this device has become the lifestyle of each society. To not wonder if the 6th business information and many are turning to mobail smartphone. With Android which thoroughly dominated the mobile industry, choosing the best Android smartphone is almost identical to choose the best smartphone, period. But while Android phones have few real opponents on other platforms, internal competition is intense.

From the sleek devices impress with the design premium, up to a full plant furniture features, to a very good device, and affordable mobile phone has a heavy weight, the Android ecosystem inhabited by a diverse range of attractive mobile phone Nokia 8 gets a poor DxOMark score Nokia 8 gets a poor DxOMark score,But "oversize" are subjective, and sometimes pieces of the specification and a list of features is not enough to get an idea of how good a phone. In this roundup, we look at the absolute best-the Android phone you can't go wrong with. The habits of young people or to accentuate trand blindly lifestyle, make this a medoroang this clever device industry vying to do modifications to the device, with a distinctly vitur vitur-tercanggihnya. So it can be received over the counter Nokia 8 gets a poor DxOMark score

While we wait for the oft-rumored Nokia 9 to be announced, HMD Global's current flagship smartphone has been put through the DxOMark testing procedures. The end result is anything but impressive, especially given the Zeiss name on the back of the phone.

While the Leica-branded camera in Huawei's Mate 10 Pro has tied it with the iPhone X in second place among the DxOMark charts, the Zeiss-infused snapper in the Nokia 8 fares much worse, with a score of 68. The top dog is still Google's Pixel 2 with 98 (keep in mind however that these scores aren't out of 100 - in time it's very possible that some smartphones will go over that, to infinity and beyond perhaps).

Camera samples: bright light (left), 5 Lux low-light (right)

The Nokia 8 sits right below the Lava Z25 and above the Gionee S10L. It does manage to score better than the ancient Nokia 808 PureView, which is the only other device from the Finnish company in DxOMark's charts.

The testing has revealed that the Nokia 8 produces images with good exposure, with usually accurate white balance - though sometimes there isn't enough saturation and you might notice some color shading. Dynamic range is good only when the Auto HDR mode is working, which apparently it often isn't, even in high-contrast shooting situations.

When it comes to both texture and noise, the Nokia 8 was found lagging behind other flagships. Fairly strong

noise is there in areas of plain color even in bright light, and detail levels are usually low, with a lot of blurring. Unsurprisingly, detail decreases even more when indoors or in low-light scenarios, and there's a noticeable loss of sharpness too, with strong softness often visible near the edges of the frame.

Camera samples: Portrait mode (left), 2x zoom (right)

The handset's autofocus is accurate in most conditions, but slows down in low light. Exposure and color are "decent" when using the dual-LED flash, but some portraits show red eyes. In the zooming department, since it lacks a dedicated tele-lens the Nokia 8 can't compete with devices that do have such a setup. Bokeh, on the other hand, while still not best in class, is good enough. Portrait mode subjects aren't always perfectly isolated, however.

In terms of shooting videos, the main shortcomings have to do with autofocus and stabilization. Autofocus sometimes doesn't trigger at all in low light, while the stabilization system "performs on a very similar level as the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge, a device that is now almost three years old". Additionally, the videos have narrow dynamic range, highlight clipping in high contrast scenes, and unstable exposure. Levels of detail are also low as for stills, yet on the flip side there's good target exposure and color rendering both in bright light and well-lit indoor scenes.

Source

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: