Comparing the sizes of flagship chipsets: Qualcomm, Samsung, Huawei adn Apple

Smart Android And Trik-Commenting on Andorid indeed never endless, because smart devices this one is often updated every certain amount of time. So that the market can always be garapnya menerinya with pleasure. And it is not denied if this device has become the lifestyle of each society. To not wonder if the 6th business information and many are turning to mobail smartphone. With Android which thoroughly dominated the mobile industry, choosing the best Android smartphone is almost identical to choose the best smartphone, period. But while Android phones have few real opponents on other platforms, internal competition is intense.

From the sleek devices impress with the design premium, up to a full plant furniture features, to a very good device, and affordable mobile phone has a heavy weight, the Android ecosystem inhabited by a diverse range of attractive mobile phone Comparing the sizes of flagship chipsets: Qualcomm, Samsung, Huawei adn Apple Comparing the sizes of flagship chipsets: Qualcomm, Samsung, Huawei adn Apple,But "oversize" are subjective, and sometimes pieces of the specification and a list of features is not enough to get an idea of how good a phone. In this roundup, we look at the absolute best-the Android phone you can't go wrong with. The habits of young people or to accentuate trand blindly lifestyle, make this a medoroang this clever device industry vying to do modifications to the device, with a distinctly vitur vitur-tercanggihnya. So it can be received over the counter Comparing the sizes of flagship chipsets: Qualcomm, Samsung, Huawei adn Apple

There are four major manufacturers of flagship chipsets – Qualcomm (Snapdragon), Samsung (Exynos), Huawei (Kirin) and Apple (A-series). Three of those tend to be used in the respective companies' own flagships. Apple certainly doesn’t want to share while Samsung and Huawei rarely find outside customers.

We often talk about the power usage of a chipset – it’s important for the battery budget. Fabbing the chip at lower nanometers helps with that, but also balances the other important sheet. The price of a chip (patent costs aside) is proportional to its size.

This makes it tricky to find the right balance between CPU power, graphics performance and additional features (image processors, AI accelerators and so on).

For the curious, Tech Insights has annotated photos of the chipset dies of the four major players. A Snapdragon 845 is 25% smaller than an Exynos 9810. The Apple A11 Bionic is even smaller than the Snapdragon, but is the only one with without a modem on board. The Kirin is somewhere in between.

Here’s a scale image of the four chipsets (click for a closer look):

And here is a table with the sizes (note that the Snapdragon 845 size is estimated):

Chipset	Size
Exynos 9810	118.94 mm²
Kirin 970	96.72 mm²
Snapdragon 845	91 mm²
A11 Bionic*	87.66 mm²
* not counting the external modem

To see if each company got its money's worth, here is how these chipsets perform in CPU and GPU tasks. (note: an Xperia XZ2 is standing in for the S845-powered Galaxy S9+)

GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)

Higher is better

Apple iPhone X
10215
Samsung Galaxy S9+
8883
Sony Xperia XZ2
8466

GHz Cortex-A53)" rel="tooltip">Huawei Mate 10
6625

GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)

Higher is better

Apple iPhone X
4256
Samsung Galaxy S9+
3771
Sony Xperia XZ2
2454
Huawei Mate 10
1882

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

Sony Xperia XZ2
55
Samsung Galaxy S9+
47
Apple iPhone X
44
Huawei Mate 10
38

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal

Higher is better

Apple iPhone X
1854
Samsung Galaxy S9+
1481
Sony Xperia XZ2
1176
Huawei Mate 10
1142

Source | Via

Let's block ads! (Why?)