Should Chrome copy Safari and help block Facebook?

Smart Android And Trik-Commenting on Andorid indeed never endless, because smart devices this one is often updated every certain amount of time. So that the market can always be garapnya menerinya with pleasure. And it is not denied if this device has become the lifestyle of each society. To not wonder if the 6th business information and many are turning to mobail smartphone. With Android which thoroughly dominated the mobile industry, choosing the best Android smartphone is almost identical to choose the best smartphone, period. But while Android phones have few real opponents on other platforms, internal competition is intense.

From the sleek devices impress with the design premium, up to a full plant furniture features, to a very good device, and affordable mobile phone has a heavy weight, the Android ecosystem inhabited by a diverse range of attractive mobile phone Should Chrome copy Safari and help block Facebook? Should Chrome copy Safari and help block Facebook?,But "oversize" are subjective, and sometimes pieces of the specification and a list of features is not enough to get an idea of how good a phone. In this roundup, we look at the absolute best-the Android phone you can't go wrong with. The habits of young people or to accentuate trand blindly lifestyle, make this a medoroang this clever device industry vying to do modifications to the device, with a distinctly vitur vitur-tercanggihnya. So it can be received over the counter Should Chrome copy Safari and help block Facebook?

Google

At its World Wide Developers Conference (WWDC) Keynote earlier this week, Apple unveiled new anti-tracking features for its Safari browser. The Cupertino company named Facebook in the speech and it will likely be affected by the changes. However, as a major provider of targeted ads, Google will also probably be hit.

The changes will see Safari block 'like' buttons, 'share' buttons, and comment sections on websites, preventing them from tracking what people do online. These buttons can track users even when they aren't logged in to the service in question. In the new version of Safari, however, if a button tries to track web browsing, a popup will appear asking if the user wants to allow it.

Safari will also protect users from 'fingerprinting,' a way of identifying them as they move across the web based on the individual aspects of their browser preferences. This can include things such as screen size, plugins in use, and fonts that may be installed.

Tracking users is important to companies like Facebook and Google as they provide targeted ad services. By seeing the types of thing you are browsing, the companies are able to show you ads that relate to things you might want to buy. This is why, after looking to buy a new phone, or flights, or shoes, you might be repeatedly hit by adverts for those products. The changes implemented by Safari could affect the ability of Facebook and Google to do this.

Chrome plugins like this one from Avira are already available to help users stop trackers.

 

Read also: iOS 12: 5 features we first spotted on Android

While the changes are likely a reaction to the ongoing Facebook data scandal, anti-tracking features on web browsers are nothing new. They have long been found on niche privacy-focused products such as Tor and Firefox Focus. There are also plenty of extensions for the likes of Chrome and Firefox that claim they can prevent tracking.

However, the addition of anti-tracking to Safari, the second most popular browser in the U.S., is different because it is being introduced as the default setup. While there is no guarantee that

anti-tracking in browsers will catch on, if users do begin to demand more features to stop targeted ads, it could put Google and Chrome in a tricky situation.

Should Google Chrome also block Facebook?

Any attempts by Google to block trackers by sites such as Facebook on Chrome would be hugely hypocritical given the tracking Google does itself. Google could argue that Chrome users know they are being tracked by Google but blocking other sites would still be a double standard.

A blanket ban on trackers would also be highly unlikely considering the company's business model. Barring a major change in the way Google sells ads, one course of action — should users demand Safari-like anti-tracking features — could be to be more transparent about the tracking that goes on.

Google has shown a willingness to improve its browser, even if it means fewer ads are shown. It recently began blocking Chrome ads that violate standards set by the Coalition for Better Advertising.

By removing the most annoying ads from the web, such as popups and auto-playing ads, Google improves the online experience and makes ad blockers less necessary. Who's to say it can't do something similar with tracking, curbing the most egregious aspects of it.

Editor's Pick

ExpressVPN review

Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) are among the best security tools a web surfer can have. You can use them to surf otherwise seedy public WiFi with more security and privacy. They can even get around …

Safari's anti-tracking measures may not become a must-have feature, and Google may not need to make any changes to Chrome to keep up at all. However, if people do start flocking to Safari, Google could have some tough decisions to make.

Finally, if you are a Chrome user, you should be aware that there are some things you can do to reduce the amount of tracking that takes place when you use the browser. This includes add-ons you can use to block trackers. It is even possible to turn on a "do not track" request, although Google does make it clear that this is just a request and it has no control over whether or not the website in question will honor it or not.

Next up: 10 best privacy apps for Android

from Android Authority https://ift.tt/2MaU5W8
via IFTTT

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: