DxO Mark gives the Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra an overall score of 75

Smart Android And Trik-Commenting on Andorid indeed never endless, because smart devices this one is often updated every certain amount of time. So that the market can always be garapnya menerinya with pleasure. And it is not denied if this device has become the lifestyle of each society. To not wonder if the 6th business information and many are turning to mobail smartphone. With Android which thoroughly dominated the mobile industry, choosing the best Android smartphone is almost identical to choose the best smartphone, period. But while Android phones have few real opponents on other platforms, internal competition is intense.

From the sleek devices impress with the design premium, up to a full plant furniture features, to a very good device, and affordable mobile phone has a heavy weight, the Android ecosystem inhabited by a diverse range of attractive mobile phone DxO Mark gives the Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra an overall score of 75 DxO Mark gives the Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra an overall score of 75,But "oversize" are subjective, and sometimes pieces of the specification and a list of features is not enough to get an idea of how good a phone. In this roundup, we look at the absolute best-the Android phone you can't go wrong with. The habits of young people or to accentuate trand blindly lifestyle, make this a medoroang this clever device industry vying to do modifications to the device, with a distinctly vitur vitur-tercanggihnya. So it can be received over the counter DxO Mark gives the Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra an overall score of 75

DxO Mark has completed its review of the Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, released way back in February, and given it an overall score of 75. That's not a lot and puts the Xperia XA2 Ultra just below the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018). That's not where you'd expect a 23MP camera with a big 1/2.3" sensor to be.

In its detailed report DxO praised the Xperia XA2 Ultra for its good exposure, pleasant color rendition with a flash and low noise in textured areas. But it took points away for the varying detail levels, noise in monotone areas and limited dynamic range.

The photo score of

75 was higher than the video score of 74 - clips were praised for good exposure and pleasant colors, but also exhibited poor detail.

If you want to see our detailed report (with a lot more camera samples attached to it) check out our written review and if you prefer watching videos here's our video review.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: