Pocophone F1 tested by DxOMark: Do you get what you pay for?

Smart Android And Trik-Commenting on Andorid indeed never endless, because smart devices this one is often updated every certain amount of time. So that the market can always be garapnya menerinya with pleasure. And it is not denied if this device has become the lifestyle of each society. To not wonder if the 6th business information and many are turning to mobail smartphone. With Android which thoroughly dominated the mobile industry, choosing the best Android smartphone is almost identical to choose the best smartphone, period. But while Android phones have few real opponents on other platforms, internal competition is intense.

From the sleek devices impress with the design premium, up to a full plant furniture features, to a very good device, and affordable mobile phone has a heavy weight, the Android ecosystem inhabited by a diverse range of attractive mobile phone Pocophone F1 tested by DxOMark: Do you get what you pay for? Pocophone F1 tested by DxOMark: Do you get what you pay for?,But "oversize" are subjective, and sometimes pieces of the specification and a list of features is not enough to get an idea of how good a phone. In this roundup, we look at the absolute best-the Android phone you can't go wrong with. The habits of young people or to accentuate trand blindly lifestyle, make this a medoroang this clever device industry vying to do modifications to the device, with a distinctly vitur vitur-tercanggihnya. So it can be received over the counter Pocophone F1 tested by DxOMark: Do you get what you pay for?

The back of the Pocophone F1.

The Pocophone F1 rightfully made headlines in 2018, offering flagship power at a mid-range price. If there's one area where it's still lagging behind, however, it's in the camera field, as we noted in our review.

Now, camera testing company DxOMark has put the phone to the test, giving it an overall score of 91 points. This puts it ahead of the original Google Pixel, the iPhone 7 duo, and the Nokia 8 Sirocco. But it lags behind the likes of the iPhone 8 series, Samsung's Galaxy Note 8 and Galaxy Note 9, Huawei's 2018 flagships, and Xiaomi's own Mi 8 and Mi Mix series.

The Pocophone F1 attained a photo score of 92, with the firm praising its autofocus performance, color reproduction, and "nice flash pictures." But the website also noted the lack of detail compared to other flagships, especially in low-light situations.

src="https://cdn57.androidauthority.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/pocophone-f1-dxomark-840x346.jpg" width="840"> DxOMark

Furthermore, DxOMark criticized the quality of zoom (the Pocophone F1 doesn't have a telephoto secondary camera), as well as depth errors when using bokeh-related modes. The company also found photos would occasionally have a "misty white haze" when using HDR (seen above, left), while the Xiaomi Mi 8 didn't have this issue at all.

Editor's Pick

The smartphone delivered a video score of 90, owing to "fast and accurate" autofocus, effective stabilization, and good color reproduction. But the reviewer docked points due to "fairly limited" dynamic range, a lack of fine detail in all conditions compared to top performers, and excessive noise in low-light situations.

The testing firm concluded that today's top-performing smartphones are a step ahead of the Xiaomi-backed device in several ways (HDR, low-light performance, zoom, bokeh). But it still called the phone an attractive purchase for the price — it only costs ~$320 after all.

NEXT: Samsung Galaxy M20 review — Finally a credible threat to Xiaomi



from Android Authority http://bit.ly/2G8SWxL
via IFTTT

Read:


Subscribe to receive free email updates:

Related Posts :

0 Response to "Pocophone F1 tested by DxOMark: Do you get what you pay for?"

Post a Comment