Qualcomm violated antitrust laws with patent licensing practices, US judge rules

Smart Android And Trik-Commenting on Andorid indeed never endless, because smart devices this one is often updated every certain amount of time. So that the market can always be garapnya menerinya with pleasure. And it is not denied if this device has become the lifestyle of each society. To not wonder if the 6th business information and many are turning to mobail smartphone. With Android which thoroughly dominated the mobile industry, choosing the best Android smartphone is almost identical to choose the best smartphone, period. But while Android phones have few real opponents on other platforms, internal competition is intense.

From the sleek devices impress with the design premium, up to a full plant furniture features, to a very good device, and affordable mobile phone has a heavy weight, the Android ecosystem inhabited by a diverse range of attractive mobile phone Qualcomm violated antitrust laws with patent licensing practices, US judge rules Qualcomm violated antitrust laws with patent licensing practices, US judge rules,But "oversize" are subjective, and sometimes pieces of the specification and a list of features is not enough to get an idea of how good a phone. In this roundup, we look at the absolute best-the Android phone you can't go wrong with. The habits of young people or to accentuate trand blindly lifestyle, make this a medoroang this clever device industry vying to do modifications to the device, with a distinctly vitur vitur-tercanggihnya. So it can be received over the counter Qualcomm violated antitrust laws with patent licensing practices, US judge rules

• Qualcomm violated antitrust laws with its patent licensing deals, a U.S. judge ruled.
• The judge called for Qualcomm to strike new patent deals without the terms in question.
• The ruling comes a month after Apple and Qualcomm decided to end all litigation against each other.

---

A U.S. federal judge has reportedly ruled that Qualcomm violated antitrust laws with its patent licensing practices.

According to the New York Times (paywall), the decision by Judge Lucy Koh marks a victory for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The commission sued Qualcomm in 2017 for charging "onerous" fees to use its patents.

Koh has ruled that the U.S. chipmaker must strike new patent licensing deals without the offending terms. Furthermore, she ruled that the company must be monitored by the FTC for seven years.

Read: Sony Mobile will be dropping (or reducing) operations in these markets

The judge noted that "Qualcomm's licensing practices have strangled competition" in the cellular modem sector. The company is one of the most prominent players in the space, alongside Intel, Huawei, MediaTek, and Samsung.

The chip company has reacted to the verdict, noting it "strongly disagrees" with the ruling. Qualcomm added that it would immediately seek to stay the district court's judgement and obtain an expedited appeal.

alt="The Qualcomm Snapdragon 855." class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-931927" height="473" src="https://cdn57.androidauthority.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Snapdragon-855-chip-4-of-4-840x473.jpg" width="840">

"We strongly disagree with the judge's conclusions, her interpretation of the facts, and her application of the law," said Qualcomm general counsel and executive vice president Don Rosenberg.

The FTC noted several reasons for a case against Qualcomm in its 2017 complaint. Some of the reasons in the complaint include the firm apparently refusing to license standard-essential patents to competitors, and a so-called "no license-no chips" policy.

Editor's Pick

Report: Apple's in-house 5G modem over 5 years away, Qualcomm truce only way out

According to a new report from The Information, the progress surrounding Apple's own in-house 5G modem for upcoming iPhones is further behind than originally anticipated. In the new report, The Information's sources suggest that the iPhone 5G modem …

The latter policy allegedly saw the firm withhold baseband chips unless customers licensed standard-essential patents on its terms. The commission added that there were "elevated royalties" for customers when using rival processors.

The news also comes just over a month after Qualcomm and Apple agreed to drop all litigation and signed a new chipset deal.

What do you think of the ruling? Sound off in the comments!

NEXT: EE kicks off 5G party in UK next week, but Huawei wasn't invited

from Android Authority http://bit.ly/2JXnBzS
via IFTTT

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: